Archive for July, 2011

Talking About “It”

July 28th, 2011 - by admin

by Judy Joppie

LCSC member, Nick’s post, was so amazing, and the responses so good, that it inspired me to post a thread similar to his.

He wondered how we handle those who do not care/advocate/support lung cancer issues.

I was very surprised by a comment that was made by a member of my in person support group a couple of weeks ago. She is a breast cancer survivor, and said that she and her husband never discussed the “C” word. She said they went about their lives as if nothing was wrong, even through her surgery and subsequent treatments.

She said he was recently diagnosed with Parkinson’s and they don’t talk about that either!

She thought that if they discuss it, it makes it more real.

This took me completely by surprise. And yet? When I was diagnosed with lung cancer, my husband didn’t want anyone to know. This perplexed me. He felt that #1 – if we discussed it, it did make it real. #2 – if people knew, they’d be asking all kinds of questions that he didn’t want to deal with.

To the #1 – I say IT IS REAL. Putting the proverbial “head in the sand” approach only makes the experience lonely, and that is the last thing someone living with cancer, or any other disease wants to feel. This discussion board is proof of that. It is healing to share the burden, the not feeling good, the side effects, and the profound effect the disease is taking on us physically, mentally, and spiritually. It is immensely helpful for caregivers to be able to “talk” about the pain they are suffering, without judgement or criticism. It is critical to healing to have support, whether on-line or in person. I advocate for both (as if you didn’t already know that about me).

To his #2 objection, I say we SHOULD talk about it, and answer people’s questions. You never know when something you’ve shared with someone else may come to play in their lives down the road. They will remember something you said, and be able to deal with their situation better. Knowledge is power, we need to share that.

And for those of us that believe in prayer, how can we ask for that if no one knows what is needed in prayer?

If you don’t believe in prayer, maybe it comforts you to know that you “are in someone’s thoughts”. Another element that is important to healing.

I just wondered if there are folks out there that feel they can’t share, and talk about it, and what effect that is having on you?
User avatar

*Judy is a volunteer moderator on LUNGevity’s Lung Cancer Support Community and a guest blogger for the Care Giving section of the LUNGevity Blog.

Share this:
Dr. Jack West

Caregivers Outnumber Patients in Online Medical Communities: Thoughts on Why?

July 28th, 2011 - by Dr. Jack West

At one of the ASCO meeetings a few years ago, the folks who developed a Dutch educational website about lung cancer called longkanker.info, described their growing experience of serving the community of patients and caregivers with lung cancer (and while I suspect that it’s a good site,  though I can’t read any of it since it’s in Dutch, so I can’t really recommend it). They reviewed their growing numbers of people in the Netherlands they were reaching, as well as how they were working to publicize it through local oncologists’ offices, but they also described their audience, which was disproportionately women more than men, and more caregivers than actual patients with lung cancer (both about 2/3 vs. 1/3, not an overwhelming majority). Moreover, the Pew Internet & American Life Project has also seen the same trends.

I don’t believe that LUNGevity keeps those records, but I think the same trends hold up here from what I’ve seen. That women are more likely to seek health care and information (and road directions) than men is a very consistent finding. But I’m particularly interested in the question of why caregivers outnumber patients in online medical communities, and perhaps especially those focusing on cancer.

(more…)

Share this:
Katie Brown

Why Be an Advocate?

July 26th, 2011 - by Katie Brown

Recently a new post on the Lung Cancer Support Community message boards posed a question asking why some people care about advocating for a cause and why others don’t.  Many of our strongest advocates are survivors or surviving family members but there are a number of people who’ve been affected by lung cancer who don’t actively support the cause.  Some people seemingly “move on”, or move past the trauma of the disease never to give it a second thought…

Unfortunately, I don’t have a clear cut answer to this question.

I wish I had some great insight into why some people choose to become advocates and others don’t.  As the Director of Support and Advocacy, I could bottle it and build a legion of people to wipe out lung cancer!  Seriously I digress.  But to better understand why some people choose to become involved and “do something” helps me determine the best advocates to train to join us in the fight against lung cancer.

I look for passion and initiative.  Advocacy doesn’t come with a road map or hand holding.  I don’t believe there is such a thing as passive advocacy.  You have to seek out opportunities and then act.

The individuals who reach out to me and show interest are the people who are dedicated to putting in the time and emotional man power to raise awareness, create great events, help craft programs and spread our message.  I look to see how long it takes someone to answer a general call to action or respond to an email.  That gives me an indicator of their level of dedication.

For me, advocating came instantly.  It wasn’t a choice.  Becoming a caregiver to a loved one with lung cancer definitely wasn’t a choice either. My choice would have been for my dad to have been healthy and not to have gotten lung cancer. 9 years ago, he wasn’t given a fighting chance or much attention and so it was up to me to demand he receive the care he deserved.  And there was virtually no support for him or our family in 2002, so I decided then to advocate for that too.

A disease like lung cancer comes with a wicked stigma, little research funding, sparse media attention and sometimes very little compassion for those diagnosed.

The more my father faced that stigma, the more I wanted to educate people about lung cancer and to change that perception.

What made me decide to become an advocate?  Love.  Compassion.  Desperation.  I have an overwhelming need to honor what my family went thru- and never forget.  By helping others and advocating for change it is a step towards helping another family navigate the cancer journey a bit easier, a bit softer and a bit gentler.

Why be an advocate?

Because your story can change lives, raise awareness, fund life-saving research, change standard of care, change policy, help the underserved communities and dispel the stigma so that no one else will ever have to go thru the lung cancer journey alone.

For more information on LUNGevity or LUNGevity’s Link Up advocacy program, click here.

Share this:

“Breaking Bad” Busts Lung Cancer Myth

July 21st, 2011 - by Juhi Kunde

This Sunday welcomed the 4th season of “Breaking Bad,” AMC’s critically-acclaimed television series about a mild-mannered chemistry teacher who is diagnosed with lung cancer. When the doctors tell him he has two years to live, he gets desperate. In an effort to put together some money for his pregnant wife and disabled son before he dies, the teacher (played by Bryan Cranston, the Dad from “Malcolm in the Middle”) starts cooking crystal meth. Antics ensue.

Granted, this show is not known for its ties to lung cancer. The reason for its popularity has more to do with blurring the lines of morality and exploring of the hero’s dark side. Nevertheless, through the course of the show, the teacher mentions lung cancer, deals with chemotherapy and often coughs   – sometimes to the point of bleeding or passing out—to remind his audience about his disease. The thing I like best about it? He never smoked.

Now, I know lung cancer is not news to the entertainment industry. Peter Jennings, Dana Reeve (Christopher Reeve’s widow), Paul Newman, Steve McQueen – all of these highly influential people were diagnosed with lung cancer. (And you can bet plenty of grips, cameramen and production assistants have also been diagnosed). Does that mean there is an opportunity for promoting lung cancer awareness through television and in the movies? It turns out that I’m not the only one who thinks so.

In fact, the inaugural Prism LUNGevity Award was given to “The Bold and the Beautiful” earlier this year for the accurate depiction of lung cancer. In 2010, the soap opera introduced a continuing storyline for Stephanie, one of the show’s main characters, to be treated for stage 4 lung cancer.

Why are these shows choosing lung cancer? Did the head writer know someone who had lung cancer? Did they simply agree to choose the leading cancer killer in the country? Did they do a survey and find lung cancer was the cancer with the greatest stigma associated with it? I don’t know. But I have emailed Vince Gilligan, the creator of “Breaking Bad,” to find out. If he gives me an answer, I’ll give you one.

In the meantime, check out the show and let me know what you think (I am in the middle of Season 1 on Netflix — so far so good). And hop on Facebook or Twitter and give the show props for busting the myth that only smokers get lung cancer.

Let’s follow LUNGevity’s lead and recognize when the entertainment industry does something to help promote lung cancer awareness.

Share this: