Archive for February, 2012

The Communications Journey

February 27th, 2012 - by admin

by Megan Giblin

Where to begin?

The “communications” topic is multi-faceted. Today, I want to focus on the beginning of my “communications journey” tied to our experience of my husband’s NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer).

Note: At the time my husband was diagnosed with NSCLC we both worked at the same company, in the same group, in the same office, and in cubicles behind one another.

Late in the day on an October afternoon in 2008, my husband received a phone call from his pulmonologist who did the lung biopsy (bronchoscopy).  Looking back on it, that doctor could have used a bedside manner or a communications course in how to share bad news with patients. Without any preparation, the doctor, who was heading out on vacation and in the process of wrapping up loose ends, called my husband at the office, where we all sat in cubicles, to tell him his bronchoscopy results. While my husband was sitting at his desk the pulmonologist told him it was lung cancer. My husband continues to say that the doctor “ripped the Band-Aid off” without warning. As a colleague and more importantly as a significant other, it was hard for me to miss that whatever his pulmonologist was telling my now husband was not good news.  Once my husband shared the devastating news with me, our lives changed forever. NSCLC was a part of our life and part of our relationship.  We were blindsided by the diagnosis and overwhelmed by questions of what to do, who to tell, what to say, etc.

Who to tell?

Like every other issue related to a cancer diagnosis, the issue of who to tell is a personal one. Everyone needs to determine who they need to or want to inform of the diagnosis and updates.  No one will have the same list of people to include. For us, we needed to tell immediate family (parents, siblings, etc.), a sub-set of our close friends, as well as a limited list of close colleagues (because of the closeness of our office there was overlap between close colleagues and close friends).

Who takes the lead on communicating updates and other relevant information?

They say that opposites attract. This is true for me and my husband. I am more of an extrovert: I am more social and outgoing than he is. He is more of an introvert: he is shy, quiet and reserved (at least until you get to know him!).  As a result, from the beginning, the communications with our network – close friends and family – have fallen to me. Taking the lead on communicating updates makes me feel like I am taking something off my husband’s shoulders. I am grateful for this and happy to take on this responsibility. Generally speaking, it is helpful for the survivor and co-survivor (spouse/significant other) to agree on who is going to take the lead on communications, noting that there could be one or multiple shifts throughout the journey.

What to communicate?

What to communicate is a bit of a moving target. Again, this is a personal choice – not everyone is the same and not everyone wants to share any or all information on their diagnosis or updates. From day one, I have looked to my husband for guidance on what to say and how much to communicate. For example, he is very matter of fact about things, but that is not the case for all survivors; other survivors may be very private and may not want anything shared.  It is a hard thing to do, but it is important to remember that you are the survivor support – you are a co-survivor in this journey. While my view is that the co-survivor needs to have his or her own network (a topic that will be discussed in a future posting) of people to go to and seek support from, it is important to remember that it is not your cancer, it is not your decision what level of information to share and/or who to include in information communications. Watch how your partner communicates and follow their lead. My experience is that it will make things easier as a couple. This approach has worked for us.  We have always tried to be up-front and straightforward in our communications.  While we may provide more details to some, our general practice is to share a summarized version of what we know.  In terms of how we deal with information intake, generally we “drink from the fire hose”, allow it to absorb, and then reach out with updates and to get support.

When to communicate?

I find it easy to see how life could become all about the cancer. This is not the approach that we have taken. We choose to focus on the positive and keep life as normal as possible (i.e., our life has not been consumed by the cancer). As a result, I tend to keep updates periodic. I flag a treatment or a scan. I follow-up on the outcome of a scan or a procedure and we summarize next steps and overall approach. For us, it is important that our close friends and family (i.e., those in the inner circle of our network) are operating on the same page, so as to avoid misunderstandings (which can and do happen, even with those who are clear and consistent in their communications approach!).  Our experience and observations of others going through a long-term or chronic illness shows that keeping a positive outlook and life as normal approach is helpful throughout the journey. It would be extremely helpful for survivor and co-survivor to discuss and agree to the frequency of updates (e.g., do you communicate only after significant events – a scan, a treatment, or a doctor’s appointment – or is there more that you feel needs to be communicated).

How to communicate?

At the beginning and until very recently, I took a direct approach, making phone calls to the parents, siblings, aunts/uncles, and close friends. To be honest, these calls were difficult, depressing, and often full of questions we were not always able to answer. At some point within the six months or eight months, I moved to e-mail based communications triggered by a scan, scan results, etc.  The e-mails started about the same time that I learned about a wonderful tool called “CaringBridge”. I WISH I’D HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOOL FROM THE BEGINNING!!! Today, I maintain updates on a CaringBridge site that I have established for my husband.  CaringBridge has made my life easier. I love the fact that you can setup an “invitation only” forum where those we designate can go in and pull down the latest update.  In addition to the secure forum there are other types of forums that you can establish (e.g., public and accessible by all). I find CaringBridge easy to use, but for some of the less tech-savvy in our network, I still make phone calls as well as send an e-mail and advise that I am posting the content to my husband’s CaringBridge site. My recommendation, once you get into a routine, is to explore CaringBridge, set-up a site and alleviate some of the stress about providing updates.

About CaringBridge:

CaringBridge provides free, personal and private websites that connect people experiencing a health challenge with family and friends, making the health journey easier through communication and support.

LUNGevity is a proud CaringBridge Partner

LUNGevity aligns with CaringBridge to ensure members of our community are aware of this helpful resource when facing a health challenge. Learn more and create your own website at www.CaringBridge.org/lungevity.

Other resources:

The LUNGevity Caregiver Resource Center

The CRC will arm caregivers with information on what to expect after a lung cancer diagnosis; what questions to ask; how to help the patient; ways to take care of themselves and a listing of resources available to people affected by lung cancer.

Share this:
Dr. Jack West

My 5 Take Home Messages from the Santa Monica Targeted Therapies Conference

February 25th, 2012 - by Dr. Jack West

I’m  heading back now from the”12th Annual Targeted Therapies in Lung Cancer Conference”, three days crammed with over 150 talks, nearly all lasting just 5 minutes, that introduce a new agent or treatment combination that would be considered a targeted therapy for lung cancer.  From this large collection, a few may well prove valuable tools, while the majority won’t meet that bar.   It’s obviously not possible to relay news on over 150 agents, each introduced over a few brief slides, but I thought I’d share five leading themes that I came away with.

(more…)

Share this:

Why Lung Cancer is MY Fight

February 21st, 2012 - by admin

By Sue Bersh

I wrote about losing a best friend to lung cancer about a year ago for LUNGevity’s blog.  As I have become more and more active with LUNGevity, I have met many, many people whose lives have been touched by lung cancer. They are people who know lung cancer’s M.O.:  going undetected until it is in its late stages; having few options for treatment; being associated with the unfair stigma/blame that shadows this disease; taking lives quickly; and leaving people shocked that their options are few.  Lung cancer is ruthless.

I lost two people I love to lung cancer. I lost my Grandma Harriet when I was 16, and I lost my dear friend, Elyse (Bernstein) Keefe, 3-1/2 years ago when she was only 45. Both were huge losses in my life, but losing Elyse was what motivated me to take action.

Like a best friend should, I lived Elyse’s lung cancer with her. My heart broke when she was first diagnosed; when her cancer returned; on the day she asked her doctor how much time she had left; when she talked about all of the things she still wanted to do in her life; and countless times in between.  And there are no words to describe what I felt when I was holding her hand when she took her last breath. It was the single saddest moment of my life. Lung cancer showed no mercy to my sweet, loving and brave friend. Lung cancer took a second person that I loved — and changed me forever.

Elyse and I had volunteered once for LUNGevity.  We promised each other that when she got better we’d volunteer regularly. I have followed through on that for us both. I feel her with me in all that I do for LUNGevity. It’s the most meaningful way I can think of to honor her memory and keep her close. It’s also the only way I can think of to help ensure that others don’t suffer the way she did.

Viktor Frankl, a psychiatrist who spent many years in a concentration camp during World War II, wrote in Man’s Search for Meaning (a book Rabbi Paul Cohen recommend to me when Elyse was sick) that everything in life can be taken from you except one thing: your freedom to choose how you will respond to a situation. What determines our quality of life is how we relate to the realities of life: what kind of meaning we assign them and what kind of attitude we cling to about them.

I lost one of my closest friends to lung cancer. I stared lung cancer in the face with her and it was terrifying. But instead of being angry and sad (and I do have a few of those moments), I have chosen to honor her journey and her memory with a legacy of love and hope. This is the meaning I have found in the loss of someone I love. This is what I have chosen to cling to.

I am honored to be a LUNGevity Board member, and I am proud to be Event Coordinator of Breathe Deep Deerfield.  Through my work with LUNGevity, I now have many friends with lung cancer. For my Grandma Harriet & Elyse; for Jill Feldman, Jerry Sorkin and my other friends with lung cancer; and for the almost one quarter of a million people diagnosed with lung cancer last year — this is MY fight now.

I hope that most of you will never know lung cancer. But the odds are not in your favor. It is the number one cancer killer, and 1 in 14 people will be diagnosed with it in our lifetime. It is likely to touch your life in some way. Anyone can get lung cancer.

Please help LUNGevity fund research into the early detection and successful treatment of lung cancer. If you live in the Chicago area, join us for a day of meaning and hope on May 6th at Deerfield High School.  Walk, run, volunteer, launch a balloon — register or donate today for Breathe Deep Deerfield.

WE can make a difference in the fight against lung cancer.

Share this:
Dr. Jack West

Should Pre-operative treatment lead to a change in the surgery done? The Balloon Theory vs. The Puddle Theory

February 17th, 2012 - by Dr. Jack West

  One of the common scenarios we discuss in our lung cancer tumor boards is like a case we just discussed recently: a patient with a tumor near the middle of the chest and some nearby lymph nodes involved had a collapsed lung lobe; the lung surgeon thinks that because of the location of this cancer, the patient is likely to need the whole lung removed is surgery is going to be a realistic option with curative intent.  This patient is a potential candidate for undergoing the rigor of losing his whole lung, based on his breathing tests, but we know that a pneumonectomy (removal of an entire lung) is a major loss, so a less extensive surgery would be attractive if feasible. This leads us to the question of whether, if we give pre-operative chemotherapy specifically with the intent of shrinking a cancer enough, we might be able to do a less extensive, lobectomy surgery (removeing one lobe instead of the whole lung), if an upfront pneumonectomy would otherwise need to be done.  A similar question is whether it’s realistic to change someone from a nonsurgical candidate due to local extensive disease into a surgical candidate based on chemotherapy +/- radiation shrinking the extent of disease.

   (more…)

Share this: