Archive for August, 2012

I Still Got This

August 29th, 2012 - by Jack Rogers

In September 2004, after ignoring an annoying throat for months and attributing it to way too much time on planes doing the corporate law gig, I was diagnosed with Stage IV squamos cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The tumor started in my left tonsil and the cancer wrapped itself around the palate and jumped over to the right side eventually circling around the jugulars and carotids and taking a ride through the lymph nodes. The treatments were brutal. I received chemo and radiation for five months, lost seventy-five pounds, lost my hair, had feeding tubes and TPN infusions hanging out of me, and quickly tired of the constant nausea and the mucositis and sores that stretched from my lips to my colon. My neck was raw and singed from the radiation (like overcooked microwave popcorn that gets tossed away) and I could no longer swallow. At one point, after a long and particularly brutal chemo session in which I went into anaphylactic shock, I actually gave up. I figured – what was done, was done. My wife, who had been driving me to my radiation session with the reckless abandon of a NYC cab driver while pleading on her cell phone for the radiologists to stay late as she battled particularly suffocating NYC rush-hour traffic, pulled the car over and yelled at me as if I was five years old and had just asked how long the ride was going to be because I had forgotten to use the restroom before we left. She said it was no longer about me – it was about all the people that were dropping off meals at our front door, the people that were leaving religious relics and prayer cards in our mailbox, the people that were lighting candles and saying prayers for us around the world, the people that were shuttling our three kids to school and to their sports and music activities, and the third grade class that had committed to eating broccoli once a week as a sacrifice in my name. She was right – it was about them. She is always right. So, I went to radiation where I swallowed my own vomit for fifty minutes while clamped to the table under my Hannibal Lecter-like chemo mask with thoughts of brave (yet squirming) third graders eating broccoli filling my head.

I’m told there was no medical explanation for my surviving that battle, but I did. After all the surgeries and treatments, I lost much of the shape to my neck as well as my jugular veins (I’d be great in a knife fight). More difficult than the physical challenges I faced post-treatment, were the mental challenges. I had so many questions. What was next for me, I wasn’t sure. Was I supposed to just suck it up and go back to work? Join a commune? Become born-again? What did it all mean? Where was I going? I had no idea.

When I was in the hospital during treatments, I spent a lot of time trying to figure out why things happen. All I figured out was I wasted a lot of time trying to figure out why things happen. Also, as I lay in the hospital bed I would hear the families of the cancer patients crying – either around my bed, the next bed or down the hall. They were crying for elderly people that were far too tired to keep battling. They were crying for young mothers that were far too young to be battling for their kids. They were crying for children that were far too innocent to be battling for their lives. The patients didn’t cry during the day in public. I’d hear them after visiting hours were over. They (really, we) cried in silence – long and hard. When we were home, we’d cry alone. But we’d never let the families hear us – we’d stop when the families came back. No one tells you how to deal with that. You quickly realize that you weren’t supposed to survive and the medical community, miracle-workers that they can be, don’t know what to do with you post-treatment. It’s kind of like when your parents pat you on the back and put you on the school bus for the first time in kindergarten – after all your parents’ obsessive research about buying the safest car with air bags and child safety seats, the bus pulls up with some Ted Nugent lookalike contest winner at the wheel and the last time anyone used a seat belt on the bus was probably when they were tested at the factory. Your parents just sort of stand there half-smirking while giving you one of those Queen Elizabeth type waves as you drive off with your nose pressed to the window realizing quickly what prison bus rides to Sing Sing must sound and smell like. Your parents have no idea if you’ll be ok, but what else are they supposed to do – home school you until you’re twenty-two? Same with the medical community – post-treatment you get the “atta boy” pat on the back and you’re out the door with a subscription offer to CURE magazine and a reminder to take two Aleve and call if there are any problems – despite the fact you’re in a daze and have no idea what the hell you’re doing.

The only advice I received post-treatment was from one of my surgeons who said, “You have a beautiful family and a beautiful life. Now go live it.” Easy for him to say – he probably still had both of his jugulars, the skin on his neck didn’t look like some Thanksgiving kitchen disaster where the turkey got way overcooked, and he probably didn’t suffer horrific neck and esophageal spasms every time he swallowed food. What the hell did “living” mean anymore? I had no idea. But slowly over the next few months and years, with my family, friends and faith at my side, I did just that – I got back to living. Running helped me leave dying behind.

On and off throughout my life, I have been “running” from something. Not sure why I’ve been given this lot in life, but I have a theory about my “running” and my life and where it takes me: I run down the path in front of me because that’s God’s plan. I run without slowing down. If I’m slowing down, I’m not running. If I’m not running, I’m catching up to all that is chasing me. If I’m running, I’m not stopping for directions or reading any signs. I don’t want to know what they mean or where I’m going anyway. If I’m running, I’m not stopping at any of those free water stations either where Good Samaritans stand there in the elements and offer sustenance. The need for sustenance makes me weak. I don’t mind being vulnerable – in fact, I welcome it – but I hate being weak. Sometimes I run in groups, but if I’m running in a group, I’m not running, we are. So I leave the group when we approach a fork in the path. Then it’s just me running again. Running down no particular path other than the one in front of me. But I’m taking notes as I run, otherwise I’m doomed to keep turning left. You can’t keep turning left (hint – you run in circles if you do).

Fast-forward to August 2011 – my wife, three kids and I entered a 5-K run on the eastern part of Long Island to help raise awareness for some beach-related environmental issues. My wife and kids all run – the kids do so competitively for their respective schools – my wife does it for the peace (mainly from me). This day was supposed to be a “fun run” for our family – despite the knowledge that once the gun sounded all pleasantries would be tossed aside and we would aggressively elbow each other for position and compete to see who would have the fastest time. A funny thing happened on the way to the finish line, though…. Soon after the race started, I was gassed and couldn’t run up the first hill. In fact, I couldn’t run much at all. I finished last in our family and even lost to kids no older than thirteen years of age that ran part of the race backwards. I’m no Frank Shorter by any means and my wife and kids are really good runners, but we all knew something was up. It sure was – late stage non-small cell squamos cell carcinoma lung cancer is what was up. I had a very large tumor in my left lung that was in a bad spot, had spread to the trachea and was pressing on my pulmonary artery. The cancer had also spread to the surrounding lymph nodes and outlying areas. After completing chemo sensitivity and resistance assays, the doctors surmised it was a twin primary tumor from eight years ago that somehow hid itself, survived the prior treatments and was now rearing its ugly head. That’s the funny thing about cancer – it hides until it’s ready to come out and once it does, it’s often at an advanced stage, especially with lung cancer. Surgery was not an option for me because it was too dicey. Four months of chemo and radiation ensued. But I never gave up running. Running was my coping mechanism. Running was my escape. Running was my way to keep going as I was going through hell (to borrow a battle cry from Winston Churchill). Running was my way to get back to living again. Running was my way of leaving dying behind again.

As a result of the disease and related oh-so-enjoyable treatments and surgeries, I have now lost most of my left lung and am learning to live life in NYC on one lung (i.e., by less audibly bemoaning each new horrible Knick signing and Mets loss as well as each new Michael Bloomberg pedestrian mall and ban on personal vices). And, I’m still running.

Throughout this most recent part of my journey, I needed a focus. I needed to turn the conversation from sickness to health, from worse to better. I needed a new path to run down. I needed a challenge I could control – instead of the cancer, the treatments and the doctors being in control. I needed to get back to living again. And, I needed it to involve running. Everest? No – I’ve never heard of anyone running up Everest, let alone on one lung. Running with the bulls? No – I’ve been gored enough by my surgeons and I run to get a seat on a train and fight for walking lanes on sidewalks every day with NYC commuters, who are much more threatening than any bull. What then? I’m a New Yorker. There’s nothing bigger or more challenging or more majestic than NYC itself. And, there’s no better way to conquer NYC than by competing in the streets among the people. The ING NYC Marathon would give me the opportunity to do just that. I’m was in. I’m was all in.

A funny thing happened on the way to the Marathon, though…my wife pulled the car over again. After my doctors approved my running in the Marathon, my wife said it couldn’t be about me. It had to be about something else. That something else became the LUNGevity Foundation.

The LUNGevity Foundation and its mission to “have a meaningful and immediate impact on improving lung cancer survival rates, ensure a higher quality of life for lung cancer patients, and provide a community for those impacted by lung cancer” connected with me. So did Tom Labrecque’s story from the “Run as One” movement. Running the Marathon under the banner of the LUNGevity Foundation and the Run as One movement would allow me to honor those that have fought the fight before me and to raise funds for lung cancer research. There’s no reason people shouldn’t learn from my journey. There’s also no reason for those battling medical challenges to spend their time as if they were a living portrait of Emmett Kelly with sadness dripping from their veins and darkness lining the tracks of their tears.

In addition, anyone that sponsors me and donates to the LUNGevity Foundation will have his or her name written on the shirt I wear while running in the Marathon. After riding their backs for the past eight years, it’s time I carried them on my back (well, their names anyway). And, carry them I will – all 26.2 miles to the finish line.

So train every day I will. No jugulars. One lung. Another round of aggressive chemo that will last through December 2012. No sweat. I don’t worry about death. I don’t worry about how much time I have left. I don’t worry about being in control of that time. I just live. Oh, how I live. And, I’m going to enjoy the walk as I begin the run down the path – wherever it takes me. I finally found my path – it’s the one to mindfulness and grace. It took a long time, but I know I’m there. And, I have plenty of sustenance for the journey – a lifetime full of faith, love, music, dance, red wine, black and white images, sunsets and wet sand.

I still got this.

To support Jack’s efforts please click here http://events.lungevity.org/site/TR/2012TeamRaiser/General?px=1705406&pg=personal&fr_id=3520

Share this:

Truth Science Verses Junk Science

August 29th, 2012 - by admin

Truth Science Verses Junk Science: How to Tell the Difference and Why it is Important

by Jessica Iannotta MS, RD, CSO, CDN
Chief Clinical Officer,  Meals to Heal

As a Registered Dietitian who is a Certified Specialist in Oncology Nutrition, I am often the key member of the healthcare team who teaches patients how to search for safe and sound nutrition and health information.  In doing so, I am able to educate them on the importance of identifying truthful, scientific information from the wealth of misleading misinformation available to today’s lung cancer patients and their families.

What exactly makes a study or article “evidence-based” and why is this important?

Evidence-based practice is a way of conducting clinical care in which a doctor or other health professional will treat their patients using a combination of experience, knowledge, and information from the most up-to-date, reliable research studies.   Evidence-based treatment is the primary treatment protocol in Western medicine and is considered the safest, most efficacious method of treating illness.  Treatments based on hearsay and anecdotes, and for which there is no evidence of efficacy or safety, are generally not advised, as they can be ineffective and pose risk to health and well-being.  When evaluating a method of treatment of care, it is important that your provider adhere to the current evidence-based standards.

Your provider may also suggest participation in a clinical trial, through which your participation will be able to strengthen the evidence available for certain treatments for your particular disease stage.  When seeking clinical trials on your own, it is important to search using a reputable source such as Clinicaltrials.gov, a service of the National Institutes of Health or LUNGevity’s Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Matching Service, which provides one-on-one support in navigating the clinical trial options.

How can you tell the difference between the experts and the quacks?

In the same way that your medical team analyze and critically judge what they read and prescribe, lung cancer patients should also seek information that is from an evidenced-based source.  Remember to always consult with your medical team before using any evidenced-based information to make changes in your diet or lifestyle.  It is important to know what to look for and where to start.  First and foremost, guard against questionable claims by brushing up on basic health and nutrition information. Becoming familiar with government health websites such as the National Cancer Institute and the USDA’s MyPlate can help you to more quickly spot inaccuracies when you are reading elsewhere. Whether the information is coming from a magazine, television program, or online, there are certain key factors to keep in mind:

  1. Look or listen for the source of health claims. Be critical of diet book authors, supplement companies, and other for-profit sources promoting their products, or of data presented with no author.
  2. When evaluating research studies, read through the entire article. Critical details of the study may not be included in the summary, or abstract. Look at the length of time of the study, as well as the number and type of participants: studies conducted for longer periods of time are considered more reliable than shorter studies, studies based on larger numbers of people are considered more reliable and meaningful, and studies based on animal or cell culture studies are not as strong as those with human subjects. Be sure that the research has been carried out by a reputable, unbiased institution, and that the authors discuss any weaknesses of the study.
  3. When evaluating online information, carefully consider the source. Websites ending in .gov, .edu, or .org indicate nonprofit organizations. When exploring for-profit websites, ending in .com or .biz, be sure to look for information about the author and sponsor.
  4. Make sure that research referenced on a website has been updated recently, and that it does not include old or non-functioning links. All research studies should be published in an outside academic journal or website with a working link, rather than self-published by the sponsors.
  5. When shopping, be on the lookout for “red flags” such as a product promising a quick fix, guarantees based on little to no actual research, research paid for by a biased sponsor, or any warnings of health-threatening side effects. Many supplements are not required to be tested for safety and effectiveness by the Food and Drug Administration, so always consult a health professional before beginning any regimen.
  6. Ask questions and for the advice of your health care team when evaluating studies. Their input is essential to assessing whether or not to pursue taking supplements.

In summary, today’s lung cancer patients need to be aware of the importance of evidence-based medicine and how to accurately recognize it when seeking information about lung cancer treatment.   Speak openly with your oncology team before implementing outside information that appears beneficial.   If you find information from a reputable source that you feel has a legitimate claim or benefit, you and your healthcare team can make the best decision that meets your needs and is compatible with your treatment plan.

___________________

References

  1. Manchikanti, Laxmaiah. “Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management, Part I: Introduction and General Considerations.” Pain Physician. 2008;11;161-186.
  2. Duyff R. L. The American Dietetic Association’s Complete Food and Nutrition Guide.(2nd edition) New York: John Wiley; 2002.
  3. American Dietetic Association, Nutrition and You: Trends 2002, Final report of findings, October 2002, available online at http://www.eatright.org/images/pr/trends02findings.pdf
  4. American Council on Science and Health, Nutrition Accuracy in Popular Magazines 2002, available online at http://www.ACSH.org
  5. University of California-Berkeley, Evaluating Web Pages, Joe Barker, 2005 available online at http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html
  6. American Dietetic Association Daily Tip February 15, 2005 available online at http://eatright.org/ <http://jn.nutrition.org/content/133/11/3794S.full>.
Share this:

My War on Lung Cancer

August 24th, 2012 - by admin

My name is “B”.

I was diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer during Thanksgiving in 2011.

It was shocking. My profile didn’t fit the stereotypical lung cancer patient. I’m a relatively young, non-smoking active individual with a healthy lifestyle and no family history of cancer. That may be why I was content with being (wrongly) diagnosed with allergies, then asthma for months, even though inhalers didn’t do anything to relieve my shortness of breath. It was hard to comprehend.

The goal of this blog is to raise awareness of lung cancer to help remove the stigma associated with lung cancer, encourage donations to lung cancer organizations, and help people detect lung cancer earlier. According to the National Cancer Institute, lung cancer is the top killing cancer in the US.

When I received my diagnosis, I was so shocked, because as a relatively young healthy non-smoker with no family history of cancer, lung cancer was not on my radar.

However, breast cancer was in my radar, because there’s a good amount of marketing for their cause. I told “M”‘s mom that I hope to bring that same level of awareness to lung cancer when I get better. She said, why wait til you get better? Why not now? I thought about it for a while.

I don’t really know when/if I’ll be free of cancer, so why wait?

My friend, “L”, accelerated my involvement in battling lung cancer in the community. She found a not-for-profit organization, LUNGevity, dedicated to eradicating lung cancer and supporting those impacted by lung cancer.  LUNGevity was more than willing to assist us in heightening awareness in the Asian community.

We joined LUNGevity’s committee and decided to bring the Asian community to Lungevity’s annual walk, Breathe Deep NYC on  October 21, 2012.

http://events.lungevity.org/site/TR/2012TeamRaiser/General/1643278695?pg=team&fr_id=3450&team_id=28860 )

Being a  leader in two major Asian organizations, “L” would be able to reach out to Asians.

Being a patient at MSK, I offered to reach out to lung cancer patients. Last week I went in to MSK for my immunotherapy and to help market Breathe Deep. I grew antsy waiting for my  treatment only to realize that I won’t get my treatment anymore. Unfortunately, the most recent CT scan showed disease progression. The trial drug had been tolerable, but the “good” days seem to have come to an end.

The doctor suggested that before we revert back to one of the harsher chemo treatments, I should try Tarceva daily for a month. The two main side effects are  diarrhea and face rashes. I’m not sure which is worse -  diarrhea or nausea. I guess we’ll see. I felt like I was losing this fight. All I could do was look at “M” and cry. I want to grow old with him, but now I’m not sure if that was possible.

My mind was swirling with mortality, until I remembered that I was suppose to talk to my nurse about marketing for Breathe  Deep. I shook off the mortality thoughts momentarily and asked her if MSK would market this event. The nurse was familiar with Breathe Deep and offered to help.

I don’t know what my prognosis is, but I felt better knowing the war against lung cancer will be promising with wonderful, compassionate, and inspiring people around me.

To continue to follow “B’s” lung cancer story, visit her blog.

Share this:
Juhi Kunde

Escaping Multiple Opinion Madness

August 13th, 2012 - by Juhi Kunde

My shower door has a leak. So, I called a handyman for an estimate to repair the seal on the door and patch a section of dry wall that has minor water damage.

The handyman explained that he’d have to cut a huge exploratory hole in the wall to make sure the leak wasn’t coming from any place else.

His approach seemed excessive. I needed multiple opinions.

A realtor friend inspected the shower. “Oh, this is simple, just screw in a new seal.”

It wasn’t simple. I wasted several months finding and then installing the seal only to discover that the leak was still there. Not only was I frustrated, but I was also getting very tired of using the guest shower.

The next guy to see the shower stall was a plumber – he shook his head mournfully as if the whole bathroom would have to be remodeled. “I can’t fix it,” he said. “You’ll need a general contractor.”

Asking a general contractor to fix a leaky shower door felt like using an axe to slice a strawberry. So I asked another plumber to take a look. “First get a water softener then you can fix the shower.”

Next, I had a local glass company give me an estimate for a fixing the leak. “Ideally, we’d just replace the seal but there is also some hardware missing,” he said. “Finding parts for these shower stalls just isn’t an option anymore. I suggest you replace the door.”

At this point, I was thoroughly confused.

Everyone who saw the shower agreed the wall damage was easy to fix. When the multiple opinions all agree, the next step is clear: patch and paint the wall.

But when it came to addressing the leak, each person had different advice. Everyone was an expert and everyone suggested a different approach.

My head was spinning. I had no idea what to do. Finally I realized there was only one way to escape this ‘multiple opinion madness’. I had to get informed.

After spending several hours reading up on contractor licenses, shower seals and water quality reports, I decided to replace the shower door. It wasn’t the cheapest option or the most expensive. But I’d read-up enough on the subject to know the solution made sense.

Obviously, fixing a shower stall does not compare to the frustration, anxiety and confusion that many patients face as they decide on a treatment plan for lung cancer. But it does highlight the benefits and drawbacks of seeking multiple opinions before making a decision.

Did you encounter ‘multiple opinion madness’ in the course of your cancer journey?

How did you handle it?

Share this: